The pricing matrix for the M3 has become quite complicated:
Processor | 8GB | 16GB | 18GB | 24GB | 36GB | 48GB | 64GB | 96GB | 128GB |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M3- | -200 | 0 | 200 | ||||||
M3 | 0 | 200 | 400 | ||||||
M3 Pro | 400 | 800 | |||||||
M3 Pro+ | 600 | 1000 | |||||||
M3 Max | 1400 | 2200 | |||||||
M3 Max+ | 1900 | 2100 | 2900 |
This looks like an attempt to steer people to manage Max and Max+ demand, especially the lack of a 64GB Max variant.
Tidbits:
- the improved graphics cache for the Pro/Max models provides a surprising amount of extra graphics power. This moves them much closer to top class graphics performance.
-
memory bandwidth for M3 Pro is only 150GB/s, M3 Max 300 GB/s and M3 Max+ 400GB/s
-
the neural engine did not get any more cores, contrary to the 32 cores now on the A17 Pro.
-
while SSD prices have halved in the last year, Apple has kept their prices the same.
-
memory pricing remains the same. Cost for extra memory up to 36GB remains high, and double the price for later increments. Mobile DDR5 is $120 per 16GB, DDR5X maybe $150.
Update 08.11. As John Gruber has pointed out, the complications are basically a function of using 2, 3 or 4 memory chips with the processor. He also would have liked a 48GB M3 Pro model, something that would be the correct mobile sweet spot. After all an M3 Pro can already draw 50W under full load, and would become quite warm under continuous load. That 6+6 configuration looks quite sweet to keep heat in check.
I suspect it does not exist because it would clearly show the kinks in Apples memory pricing, a lamentable victory of marketing over user needs.